# Article Name Azure DevOps Access Reviews: 8 Platforms to Consider in 2026 # Article Summary Compare eight platforms for running Azure DevOps access reviews in 2026, from SaaS governance tools to enterprise IGA solutions with AI automation. # Original HTML URL on Toriihq.com https://www.toriihq.com/articles/azure-devops-user-review-platforms # Details Development platforms accumulate access permissions faster than most business applications. Azure DevOps repositories contain source code, CI/CD pipelines, build artifacts, and deployment credentials that represent both intellectual property and production infrastructure access. A developer who contributed to a project two years ago may still have push access to repositories they no longer touch. A contractor who helped configure release pipelines during a sprint might retain permissions to modify deployment targets long after their engagement ended. Azure DevOps organizes permissions through organizations, projects, teams, and individual security groups that layer in complex ways. Someone might have contributor access through their team membership, additional permissions granted for a specific repository, and inherited rights from a project-level security group that nobody remembers adding them to. The platform provides granular permission controls, but auditing who has access to what across dozens of projects requires manual inspection that rarely happens systematically. Third-party governance platforms address these gaps by connecting to Azure DevOps APIs, identity providers, and HR systems to build comprehensive access maps. Some focus on developer tools as one application in a broader SaaS governance strategy while others specialize in deep permission analysis for development environments. This article examines eight platforms for Azure DevOps access reviews in 2026, covering discovery methods, certification workflows, and remediation capabilities. ## Torii Torii [https://www.toriihq.com] combines SaaS management with identity governance in a single platform, providing visibility into Azure DevOps access alongside your entire application portfolio. The platform connects to Azure DevOps through direct API integration, pulling user accounts, license assignments, and access patterns into a unified dashboard where IT and security teams can manage certifications without switching between tools. For Azure DevOps specifically, Torii surfaces employee names, email addresses, titles, departments, user status, license types, and license assignments. This data feeds into access review workflows where managers can certify that team members still need their Azure DevOps permissions based on current project assignments and role responsibilities. The platform flags accounts that appear inactive or misaligned with organizational roles, routing review requests to appropriate owners automatically. Torii's AI-powered discovery goes beyond what Azure DevOps reports natively, correlating access data with information from your identity provider and HR systems to identify shadow access patterns. The workflow automation handles not just the certification process but also remediation, triggering license reclamation or access revocation when reviewers make decisions. Organizations running compliance programs for SOC 2 or ISO 27001 can generate audit evidence directly from the platform without manual data collection. Pros: - AI-powered discovery finds shadow access and orphaned accounts across your SaaS portfolio including Azure DevOps - Unified platform eliminates context switching between SaaS management and identity governance tools - 170+ direct integrations enable cross-application access reviews in a single campaign - Workflow automation handles remediation automatically when reviewers make certification decisions Cons: - Not the cheapest option for organizations focused purely on Azure DevOps without broader SaaS governance needs - Cloud-only platform may not suit organizations requiring on-premise deployment for compliance reasons G2: 4.5 out of 5 stars (302 reviews) Capterra: 4.9 out of 5 stars (26 reviews) ## Veza Veza takes a permission-centric approach to identity governance, mapping effective access rights rather than just assigned roles. For Azure DevOps environments, this means understanding not just group memberships but the actual capabilities those memberships grant across repositories, pipelines, and project resources. The platform's Access Graph technology visualizes these relationships, showing how a developer's access to a production deployment pipeline traces back through multiple security groups and project permissions. The platform connects to Azure DevOps alongside 300+ other integrations, creating a unified view of access across your identity ecosystem. Veza translates complex Azure DevOps permissions into plain language, showing whether users have Create, Read, Update, or Delete capabilities on specific resources. This clarity helps reviewers make informed decisions during certification campaigns without needing deep expertise in Azure DevOps permission structures. Review Intelligence, Veza's AI-powered recommendation engine, suggests approval or revocation decisions based on historical patterns and peer group analysis. If most developers in similar roles have been approved for repository read access but denied pipeline modification rights, the system highlights anomalies where someone has broader permissions than their peers. This risk-based prioritization helps security teams focus attention on the access grants that matter most rather than rubber-stamping thousands of routine certifications. Pros: - Access Graph technology shows effective permissions, not just role assignments, revealing actual Azure DevOps capabilities - Permission translation into plain language helps non-technical reviewers understand what they are certifying - Activity insight distinguishes used access from granted-but-unused permissions Cons: - Enterprise-focused pricing may be prohibitive for smaller development teams - ServiceNow acquisition could mean product direction changes as integration priorities evolve Gartner: 4.9 out of 5 stars (29 reviews) Capterra: 5.0 out of 5 stars (1 review) ## SAP Cloud Identity Access Governance SAP Cloud Identity Access Governance extends beyond the SAP ecosystem to govern access across connected applications including Azure DevOps. Organizations already using SAP for core business systems can leverage their existing governance investment to include developer tool access reviews, creating a unified compliance program that spans ERP and development platforms. The platform connects through SCIM-based integrations, pulling Azure DevOps user data into SAP's certification workflow engine. The Access Certification service supports multiple review types including user-centric campaigns where managers verify their team members' Azure DevOps access and application-centric reviews where project owners certify who should have access to specific repositories or pipelines. Machine learning algorithms analyze access patterns to suggest role optimizations, identifying where Azure DevOps permissions could be consolidated into standardized role definitions rather than scattered individual grants. For organizations with hybrid environments spanning SAP GRC Access Control and cloud applications, the unique Bridge capability maintains governance continuity during cloud migration. Development teams using Azure DevOps alongside SAP development tools like SAP BTP or ABAP environments can manage access reviews through a single platform rather than maintaining separate governance processes. Recent updates include enhanced Segregation of Duties rulesets that can span multiple systems, flagging conflicts where Azure DevOps deployment access combined with financial system access creates risk. Pros: - Native SAP ecosystem integration valuable for organizations already invested in SAP governance tooling - Unique hybrid Bridge capability connects on-premise GRC with cloud application governance - Machine learning role optimization reduces over-provisioned Azure DevOps access Cons: - Limited value for organizations without SAP infrastructure investment elsewhere in their stack - Public cloud only deployment may not meet strict data residency requirements Gartner: 4.4 out of 5 stars (114 reviews) ## One Identity One Identity Manager provides enterprise-grade identity governance with deep Microsoft ecosystem integration that extends naturally to Azure DevOps. Organizations using Active Directory, Azure AD, and Microsoft development tools benefit from the platform's native understanding of Microsoft permission models and security group structures. The Starling Connect capability links Azure DevOps access data with the broader identity governance program, enabling certifications that consider a developer's entire access footprint across both Microsoft and non-Microsoft systems. The attestation framework in One Identity Manager treats Azure DevOps access certification as one component of comprehensive user reviews. Managers can verify that employees' development platform access aligns with their current role alongside their access to other systems, identifying where someone might have accumulated Azure DevOps permissions during a project assignment that should have been temporary. Compliance frameworks can be linked to attestation policies, ensuring Azure DevOps reviews meet SOX, HIPAA, or other regulatory requirements. Automation capabilities reduce the manual effort typically associated with access reviews. When managers deny Azure DevOps access during certification, One Identity can automatically trigger deprovisioning workflows that remove the user from relevant security groups without requiring separate action from IT administrators. The platform supports complex approval hierarchies where Azure DevOps access decisions might require sign-off from both the technical project owner and the employee's organizational manager before taking effect. Pros: - Deep Microsoft ecosystem integration provides native understanding of Azure DevOps permission structures - Unified IGA and PAM platform eliminates need for separate privileged access management - Cost-effective compared to SailPoint for similar enterprise governance capabilities Cons: - Steep learning curve requires dedicated IAM expertise for implementation and management - User interface for attestations is dated compared to modern cloud-native alternatives Gartner: 4.4 out of 5 stars (155 reviews) Capterra: 5.0 out of 5 stars (2 reviews) ## Oracle Identity Governance Oracle Identity Governance brings institutional-grade certification capabilities to organizations with complex compliance requirements spanning Oracle and non-Oracle systems. Azure DevOps access reviews run through the same certification engine that governs Oracle database access, Fusion Applications permissions, and other enterprise systems, creating consistency in how access decisions are documented and audited across the technology portfolio. The platform's event-based micro-certifications provide real-time access reviews triggered by job changes or organizational moves. When a developer transfers from one team to another, Oracle Identity Governance can automatically initiate certification of their Azure DevOps access, ensuring permissions align with their new role rather than carrying forward access from previous assignments. This continuous certification approach catches access drift faster than periodic campaigns that might run quarterly or annually. Oracle Identity Role Intelligence applies machine learning to Azure DevOps permission data, identifying common access patterns that could be standardized into roles. Instead of managing hundreds of individual permission grants across repositories and pipelines, organizations can consolidate access into role definitions that simplify both provisioning and certification. The AI provides prescriptive recommendations during reviews, suggesting whether to approve or revoke access based on peer group comparisons and usage patterns. Pros: - Event-based micro-certifications catch Azure DevOps access drift in real-time rather than waiting for periodic reviews - AI-powered Role Intelligence identifies opportunities to standardize scattered individual permissions into managed roles - Enterprise-grade scalability handles complex multi-project Azure DevOps environments Cons: - Complex implementation takes months rather than weeks typical of cloud-native alternatives - Premium pricing and ongoing maintenance costs require significant budget allocation - User interface has not evolved significantly, impacting reviewer experience G2: 3.8 out of 5 stars (71 reviews) Capterra: 4.4 out of 5 stars (7 reviews) Gartner: 4.6 out of 5 stars (346 reviews) ## Omada Identity Omada Identity positions itself as a governance-focused platform with particular strength in regulated industries where Azure DevOps access reviews must meet strict compliance standards. The platform's IdentityPROCESS+ framework provides pre-built best practices for access certification that organizations can adopt rather than designing governance programs from scratch. This accelerated approach enables 12-week implementations that get Azure DevOps governance running faster than typical enterprise IGA deployments. The Javi AI assistant introduces conversational governance capabilities where stakeholders can initiate and complete Azure DevOps access reviews directly within collaboration tools like Microsoft Teams. Entitlement owners can launch certification campaigns, respond to review requests, and approve or deny access without leaving their normal workflow. This embedded approach reduces friction that often causes access reviews to drag on past compliance deadlines. Cross-system certification campaigns include Azure DevOps alongside other applications in unified review workflows. Rather than running separate campaigns for each system, managers can verify their team's complete access footprint in a single review session, identifying where Azure DevOps permissions combined with access to other systems might create risk. The platform supports up to nine layers of approval for complex governance scenarios where Azure DevOps access decisions require multiple sign-offs before implementation. Pros: - Javi AI assistant enables conversational access reviews directly within Microsoft Teams - 12-week deployment guarantee significantly faster than industry average for IGA implementations - 50+ pre-built compliance report templates for regulatory frameworks including SOC 2 and ISO 27001 Cons: - Cloud version pricing significantly higher than on-premise deployment option - Large-scale recertification campaigns can experience performance delays G2: 4.5 out of 5 stars Gartner: 4.6 out of 5 stars (211 reviews) ## MiniOrange MiniOrange offers an affordable entry point for organizations that need Azure DevOps access governance without enterprise IGA complexity. Starting at $2-3 per user monthly, the platform provides SSO, provisioning, and basic access governance capabilities that smaller development teams can implement without significant budget allocation. The rapid deployment model gets Azure DevOps connected in hours rather than the weeks or months typical of traditional IGA implementations. The platform connects to Azure DevOps through its extensive integration library, pulling user accounts and permissions into centralized identity management. SCIM-based provisioning ensures that when employees join, move, or leave the organization, their Azure DevOps access updates automatically based on their status in the HR system or directory. This automated lifecycle management prevents the orphaned accounts and lingering access that create security risks in development platforms. For access reviews, MiniOrange integrates with Jira Service Management to create workflow-based certification processes. Managers receive access review requests as Jira tickets, documenting their approval or denial decisions with full audit trails. While this approach lacks the sophistication of dedicated IGA platforms, it provides compliance documentation at a fraction of the cost, making it practical for organizations where budget constraints prevent investment in enterprise governance tools. Pros: - Pricing at $2-3 per user monthly makes access governance accessible to smaller development teams - Rapid deployment connects Azure DevOps in hours rather than weeks or months - 6,000+ pre-built integrations enable visibility across diverse application portfolios Cons: - Access review capabilities require Jira integration rather than native certification workflows - Lacks sophisticated AI-driven risk analytics found in enterprise IGA platforms - Support quality varies significantly based on user reports G2: 4.5 out of 5 stars (264 reviews) Capterra: 4.5 out of 5 stars (36 reviews) ## Ping Identity Ping Identity provides enterprise-scale identity governance backed by nine consecutive years as a Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader in Access Management. For Azure DevOps access reviews, the Autonomous Identity capability applies machine learning to analyze permissions across millions of data points, identifying access anomalies and blind spots that manual reviews would miss. The platform evaluates Azure DevOps permissions in context of a user's complete identity profile, flagging where development platform access combined with other system privileges creates elevated risk. The certification workflow engine supports multiple review types including application-centric campaigns focused specifically on Azure DevOps and user-centric campaigns that verify a developer's complete access footprint across all systems. Micro-certifications enable targeted reviews when specific Azure DevOps permissions change, providing just-in-time validation rather than waiting for the next scheduled campaign cycle. AI-assisted decisioning recommends approval or revocation based on peer group analysis and historical certification patterns. PingOne Protect adds real-time risk assessment to ongoing access monitoring, continuously evaluating user behavior against established baselines. If a developer's Azure DevOps activity patterns change significantly, such as accessing repositories they have never touched or triggering deployments outside normal working hours, the platform can flag the behavior for review or automatically step up authentication requirements. This continuous assessment complements periodic access certification with real-time risk awareness. Pros: - Autonomous Identity AI evaluates millions of permissions per minute to identify Azure DevOps access anomalies - Proven enterprise scale handles Fortune 500 environments with 200M+ daily authentications - Hybrid deployment flexibility supports SaaS, on-premise, and FedRAMP requirements Cons: - Identity governance features require separate purchase from core PingOne platform - Complex initial setup requires significant IAM expertise and potentially consulting partners - Higher cost structure better suited to large enterprise budgets G2: 4.5 out of 5 stars (264 reviews) Capterra: 4.7 out of 5 stars (39 reviews) Gartner: 4.4 out of 5 stars (612 reviews) ## How to Choose Selecting the right platform for Azure DevOps access reviews depends on your organization's broader identity governance maturity, compliance requirements, and existing technology investments. Organizations with simple needs and limited budgets might start with MiniOrange to establish basic access governance workflows before investing in more sophisticated platforms. Enterprises with complex hybrid environments and strict regulatory requirements will find deeper capabilities in Oracle Identity Governance or Ping Identity. For organizations prioritizing AI-enabled shadow IT discovery, SaaS financial governance, and automated license remediation alongside access reviews, Torii provides a unified approach that eliminates tool sprawl. The platform's combination of SaaS management and identity governance means access certification happens in context of application usage and cost data rather than in isolation. Development teams benefit from seeing Azure DevOps access alongside their complete SaaS footprint in a single dashboard. The choice ultimately comes down to matching platform capabilities with your specific requirements. Run proof-of-concept evaluations with your actual Azure DevOps data to understand how each platform handles your permission structures, project organization, and integration landscape before committing to a long-term governance partnership.