# Article Name Greenhouse User Access Reviews: 8 Leading Vendors in 2026 # Article Summary Compare 8 identity governance platforms for Greenhouse access reviews. Find the right solution for compliance, security, and automated certifications in 2026. # Original HTML URL on Toriihq.com https://www.toriihq.com/articles/best-greenhouse-access-review-platforms # Details Greenhouse holds sensitive recruiting data including candidate information, interview feedback, and hiring decisions. Organizations need clear visibility into who can access this recruiting system and whether those permissions still make sense. Running Greenhouse access reviews manually through spreadsheets creates gaps. Reviewers miss inactive accounts, can't spot privilege creep across departments, and struggle to prove compliance during audits. Identity governance platforms automate these reviews, flag risky access patterns, and maintain audit trails that satisfy SOC 2 and ISO 27001 requirements. Eight identity governance platforms tackle Greenhouse access certifications through different approaches. Automation capabilities, integration methods, and compliance features separate them. ## Torii Torii [https://www.toriihq.com] combines SaaS management with identity governance, giving teams visibility into Greenhouse alongside their broader application portfolio. The platform discovers Greenhouse accounts through SSO integration, direct API connections, and browser extension monitoring to capture both sanctioned and shadow access. Torii tracks employee name and email, user title and department, user status, and historical usage patterns within Greenhouse. Reviewers certify permissions without leaving their workflow as this data feeds into access review campaigns. The platform routes requests to the correct app owners automatically and flags suspicious patterns using AI. Torii's in-place attestations let hiring managers approve or revoke Greenhouse access directly within Slack or email notifications. The system maintains immutable audit trails showing who had access when, which decisions were made, and what evidence supports each certification. When someone leaves or changes roles, workflow automation triggers Greenhouse deprovisioning across connected systems. The platform shines for organizations managing dozens of SaaS applications beyond just Greenhouse. Shadow IT discovery identifies unsanctioned recruiting tools, financial governance tracks spend, and the plugin marketplace extends functionality through custom integrations. Pros: - AI flags unusual Greenhouse access patterns and routes reviews to appropriate managers automatically - Combined SMP and IGA approach eliminates need for separate tools to manage recruiting applications - Workflow automation handles onboarding and offboarding without manual ticket creation - In-place attestations complete certifications faster with anomaly flags and routed ownership Cons: - Not the cheapest option, positioned as enterprise solution starting at $2.50 per employee monthly - No on-premise deployment, focused exclusively on SaaS and cloud applications G2: 4.5/5 stars (302 reviews) Capterra: 4.9/5 stars (26 reviews) ## Lumos Lumos positions itself as the first autonomous identity platform, using an AI agent called Albus to complete Greenhouse access reviews [https://www.lumos.com/] automatically. The agent analyzes peer group access patterns, usage data, and anomalies to approve or reject permissions without requiring manual decisions on every line item. The platform integrates with Greenhouse through its connector library, pulling user accounts and entitlement data for granular visibility. Lumos tracks changes between review cycles using delta reviews, so subsequent certifications only cover modifications since the last audit rather than forcing reviewers to re-examine unchanged access. Albus speeds Greenhouse access reviews by handling low-risk decisions autonomously. Reviewers focus on high-risk or unusual permissions flagged by the AI, while routine renewals get processed automatically based on learned patterns. The system claims organizations complete campaigns seven times faster with 50-plus hours saved quarterly. For recruiting teams using Greenhouse alongside other applications, Lumos provides a self-service app portal where employees request access through Slack or Teams. Approval workflows route to hiring managers, and the platform enforces time-based access controls for temporary permissions. Pros: - Albus AI agent completes reviews seven times faster by auto-approving based on peer analysis - Delta reviews focus only on changes since last cycle, reducing reviewer fatigue significantly - Excellent user experience with Slack and Teams integration for one-click approvals - Strong compliance support for SOX, SOC 2, ISO 27001 with evidence-backed audit reports Cons: - Steeper learning curve than marketing suggests, teams need weeks to master workflows - No live chat support, relies on self-service resources before escalating to support team - Premium pricing without transparency, requires sales engagement to evaluate platform G2: 4.7/5 stars (54 reviews) Gartner Peer Insights: 4.7/5 stars (47 reviews) ## SAP Cloud Identity Access Governance SAP Cloud IAG [https://www.sap.com/products/financial-management/cloud-iam.html] brings enterprise governance capabilities to organizations already invested in the SAP ecosystem. The platform runs access certifications across Greenhouse and other cloud applications through a dashboard-driven interface built on SAP Business Technology Platform. For Greenhouse reviews, SAP IAG creates certification campaigns on customizable schedules. Line managers receive cases containing all necessary information about user access, with the ability to approve, reject, or delegate decisions. The platform tracks campaign progress in real-time and escalates overdue reviews automatically. SAP IAG enforces segregation of duties policies across connected systems including Greenhouse. Organizations define which permission combinations create compliance risks, and the platform identifies violations before they occur. Machine learning algorithms optimize role assignments based on usage patterns to reduce over-provisioning. The platform works best for SAP-centric enterprises managing SuccessFactors alongside Greenhouse for recruiting. Native integration with SAP applications provides turnkey connectivity, while SCIM-based connectors handle non-SAP systems through standard protocols. Pros: - Native SAP ecosystem integration provides seamless governance across Ariba, SuccessFactors, S/4HANA Cloud - Unique hybrid bridge capability extends governance from on-premise GRC to cloud applications - Machine learning role optimization reduces over-provisioning and improves certification accuracy Cons: - Limited workflow customization compared to on-premise SAP Access Control reduces flexibility - Complex product with steep learning curve, requires specialized SAP knowledge for optimal use - Enterprise-level pricing not suitable for small businesses, requires significant investment G2: 3.0/5 stars (limited reviews) Gartner Peer Insights: 4.4/5 stars (114 reviews) ## One Identity One Identity Manager [https://www.oneidentity.com/] provides comprehensive governance capabilities for enterprises with complex hybrid environments. The platform's attestation framework defines which objects get reviewed, when reviews occur, and who handles certifications for systems including Greenhouse. Greenhouse access reviews follow One Identity's standard certification workflow. Administrators create attestation policies specifying campaign parameters, then execute campaigns that generate individual decision cases for managers. Reviewers verify access correctness and initiate changes through the workflow interface, with complete audit trails recorded for compliance. The platform connects to Greenhouse through Starling Connect for cloud applications or SCIM 2.0 connectors for standard integration. One Identity's strength lies in supporting 6,000-plus pre-built connectors, making it practical to govern Greenhouse alongside legacy systems and on-premise applications. Organizations using One Identity for Greenhouse reviews gain unified IGA and PAM capabilities. Privileged access governance ensures admin accounts receive appropriate scrutiny during certifications, and segregation of duties policies prevent conflicts across recruiting systems. Pros: - Cost-effective compared to SailPoint and other enterprise IGA solutions with similar capabilities - Unified IGA and PAM platform eliminates need for separate privileged access tools - Strong automation capabilities, customers report threefold reduction in manual IAM work - Deep SAP integration since 2003, suitable for SuccessFactors and Greenhouse governance together Cons: - Attestation user experience needs improvement, interface not intuitive for end users - Steep learning curve requires implementation partner, not suitable without dedicated IAM teams - Complex deployment takes weeks to months with implementation costs between five and fifty thousand dollars Gartner Peer Insights: 4.4/5 stars (155 reviews) Capterra: 5.0/5 stars (2 reviews) ## Saviynt Saviynt [https://saviynt.com/] takes a continuous compliance approach to Greenhouse access reviews rather than relying solely on periodic campaigns. The platform monitors access patterns in real-time, triggering micro-certifications and automatic suspensions when risks emerge between scheduled review cycles. For Greenhouse specifically, Saviynt's AI-powered trust scoring automates low-sensitivity approval decisions. The system analyzes peer groups to identify appropriate access patterns, then auto-approves routine renewals that match established baselines. This reduces approver workload by up to 75 percent while focusing human attention on high-risk or anomalous permissions. Saviynt's mobile certification experience enables Greenhouse access reviews from any device. Hiring managers approve or reject access through intuitive interfaces designed for everyday users rather than IAM specialists. The platform routes reviews to enterprise owners and resource owners based on configurable workflows. Organizations report 60 percent improvement in Greenhouse review completion times after implementing Saviynt. Revocation rates increase 35 percent as reviewers have better context for decisions, and the platform has driven over five million revocations of overprovisioned access across 80,000-plus campaigns. Pros: - Only unified IGA and PAM platform built on same code base eliminates bolt-on products - Highest Gartner rating in IGA at 4.8 stars with 85 percent five-star reviews - AI-powered trust scoring reduces approver workload by 75 percent with peer group analysis - Customers report 60 percent improvement in review completion times after implementation Cons: - Mixed customer support reviews, tickets stay open too long before resolution - Steep learning curve despite user-friendly frontend, backend complexity requires specialized expertise - High total cost of ownership including implementation and professional services beyond subscription G2: 3.5/5 stars (limited reviews) Gartner Peer Insights: 4.8/5 stars (185 reviews) Capterra: 4.5/5 stars (2 reviews) ## CloudEagle CloudEagle [https://www.cloudeagle.ai/] combines access governance with SaaS spend management, positioning itself as a modular platform where organizations buy only needed capabilities. The SaaS Governance Module handles Greenhouse access reviews through automated campaigns that integrate with existing workflows. CloudEagle auto-collects Greenhouse user and access data through SSO integration, identity providers, and direct API connections. The platform supports both SCIM and non-SCIM applications from a single dashboard, providing granular visibility into who has Greenhouse permissions across the organization. For Greenhouse access reviews, CloudEagle lets administrators initiate certifications immediately or schedule recurring cycles. Multiple applications including Greenhouse can be reviewed simultaneously, with different evaluators assigned to each system. The platform flags overprivileged users, inactive admin accounts, and anyone who hasn't logged into Greenhouse for 90-plus days. Reviewers handle Greenhouse certifications directly within Slack through no-code workflows. Rejected users move to a dedicated deprovisioning tab where access can be revoked directly in CloudEagle or evidence attached for external removal. SOC 2 compliance reports generate in 15 minutes rather than hours. Pros: - 80 percent reduction in time for Greenhouse access reviews through automation - Industry-leading 500-plus direct integrations ranked number two among vendors in Gartner report - Slack-native workflows enable approvals without leaving communication tools, improving adoption - AI flags overprivileged users, inactive admins, and users with excessive or suspicious permissions Cons: - Steep learning curve for complex features, users report difficult setup and configuration - Less intuitive user interface, some find navigation and functionality understanding challenging - Limited automation for complex multi-step processes compared to specialized IGA platforms G2: 4.7/5 stars (150-plus reviews) Gartner Peer Insights: 4.6/5 stars (53 ratings) ## Ping Identity Ping Identity [https://www.pingidentity.com/en.html] delivers enterprise-grade governance through PingOne Advanced Identity Cloud, combining access management with identity governance capabilities. The platform's Autonomous Identity component uses machine learning to analyze Greenhouse access and identify blind spots that traditional reviews miss. For Greenhouse access reviews, Ping Identity provides pre-built certification templates following industry best practices. Administrators create campaigns based on these templates, defining certifiers and scope for reviewing application access, role membership, accounts, or specific entitlements within Greenhouse. Ping's AI-assisted decisioning provides recommendations that help Greenhouse access reviewers make informed choices quickly. The system evaluates millions of permissions per minute, categorizing risk levels and prioritizing high-risk access for immediate attention. Micro-certifications enable ad hoc targeted reviews when specific Greenhouse permissions need validation outside regular cycles. The platform supports multiple certifiers with decision precedence rules, so organizations can route Greenhouse reviews through appropriate approval chains. PingOne Protect calculates real-time risk scores combining bot detection, user behavior analytics, and anomaly detection to identify suspicious Greenhouse access patterns. Pros: - AI-powered Autonomous Identity evaluates millions of permissions per minute identifying access blind spots - Comprehensive enterprise-wide visibility across cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments - 6,500-plus orchestrated capabilities across 350-plus connectors enable rapid integration - Real-time risk-based access reviews using PingOne Protect with UEBA and anomaly detection Cons: - Complex initial setup requires significant IAM expertise, extending deployment timelines - Steep learning curve, governance administrators find interface complexity challenging - Higher cost for mid-market starting at 16,000 to 35,000 dollars annually plus implementation G2: 4.5/5 stars (264 verified reviews) Gartner Peer Insights: 4.1/5 stars for IGA (54 reviews) Capterra: 4.7/5 stars (39 reviews) ## Avatier Avatier [https://www.avatier.com/] positions itself as a rapid-deployment alternative to lengthy IGA implementations. The platform's Identity Anywhere approach runs on Docker containers, enabling Greenhouse access governance deployments in as little as 14 days compared to months for traditional solutions. Avatier's Access Certification Snapshot functionality creates Greenhouse governance projects with flexible criteria selection and reviewer assignment. Delta Access Certification reviews only changed objects since the last audit, dramatically reducing reviewer fatigue for recurring Greenhouse certifications. The platform provides complete visibility into Greenhouse privileges through a unified dashboard with visual displays. Reviewers see user photos, application logos, and real-time account information including status, expiration dates, and last login activity. This context helps managers make informed decisions about whether Greenhouse access still makes sense. Avatier handles Greenhouse access reviews across multiple channels. Managers conduct certifications from iOS or Android devices, within Microsoft Teams, through Outlook, or via Slack. Push notification workflows ensure reviewers receive alerts regardless of their preferred communication platform. Pros: - Industry-leading deployment speed with fully functional governance in two to 12 weeks - All-in-one platform combines IGA, SSO, MFA, and password management eliminating tool sprawl - Delta certification reviews only changed objects, dramatically reducing reviewer burden - True multi-platform access enables Greenhouse certifications from Teams, Slack, mobile, or desktop Cons: - User interface complexity can overwhelm new users initially, training and phased rollout recommended - Limited out-of-box reporting customization compared to some competitors - Small market presence with only 0.04 percent IAM market share lacks community resources G2: 4.6/5 stars (31 reviews) TrustRadius: 9.1/10 for ID Management Workflow Automation ## How to Choose the Right Platform Greenhouse access reviews need to happen regardless of which platform you select. The question is whether you'll manage them manually through spreadsheets or automate the process with proper governance tooling. Your broader identity landscape shapes platform selection. Organizations managing dozens of SaaS applications beyond Greenhouse benefit from platforms like Torii or CloudEagle that combine governance with SaaS management. These tools discover shadow recruiting apps, track spend, and provide unified visibility across your entire application portfolio. Native integrations matter when you've already invested in specific ecosystems. SAP shops running SuccessFactors alongside Greenhouse gain efficiency from SAP Cloud IAG's turnkey connectivity. Microsoft-centric organizations using Azure AD may prefer Ping Identity's standards-based approach. AI-powered automation reduces the manual burden of Greenhouse access reviews. Lumos and Saviynt use machine learning to auto-approve routine renewals based on peer group analysis, letting reviewers focus on high-risk or anomalous permissions. These capabilities deliver measurable time savings reported at 60-75 percent reduction in review completion times. Compliance requirements drive platform selection for regulated industries. Healthcare organizations needing HIPAA compliance or financial services firms subject to SOX audits require comprehensive audit trails, evidence collection, and automated reporting. Platforms like Saviynt, Ping Identity, and One Identity provide industry-specific compliance templates that simplify regulatory examinations. Deployment speed matters when audit deadlines loom. Avatier's containerized approach enables functional governance in weeks rather than months, making it practical for organizations facing imminent compliance reviews. CloudEagle similarly claims 30-minute setup for basic connectivity, though full configuration takes longer. Budget considerations extend beyond subscription costs to include implementation services, ongoing maintenance, and training. Saviynt and One Identity offer enterprise capabilities at lower total cost than SailPoint, while still requiring professional services for deployment. Torii's transparent per-employee pricing makes budgeting straightforward for mid-market organizations. Integration ecosystem depth determines how quickly you can expand governance beyond Greenhouse. Ping Identity's 6,500 orchestrated capabilities and One Identity's 6,000 pre-built connectors provide flexibility to govern legacy systems, on-premise applications, and emerging SaaS tools as your stack evolves. Ultimately, effective Greenhouse access reviews require answering three questions consistently: who has access, is that access still appropriate, and can you prove it during audits. Identity governance platforms automate these answers while maintaining the audit trails that satisfy compliance requirements.