# Article Name 8 Ways to Run Miro Access Audits in 2026 # Article Summary Compare eight platforms for running Miro access audits in 2026, from SaaS governance tools to enterprise IGA solutions with AI-powered automation. # Original HTML URL on Toriihq.com https://www.toriihq.com/articles/eight-miro-iga-solutions # Details Visual collaboration platforms accumulate permissions in ways that traditional business applications rarely do. Miro boards capture brainstorming sessions, strategy documents, product roadmaps, and sensitive planning materials that teams share across departments and external stakeholders with minimal friction. A contractor who joined a board for a single workshop two years ago may still have edit access to evolving strategic content. A former employee's guest account might retain visibility into competitive analysis boards that the team continues updating. Miro structures access through team memberships, board-level sharing, and organization-wide settings that layer in ways the admin console displays individually but audits poorly at scale. Someone might access a board through their team membership, direct sharing from a colleague, and guest access granted for a workshop that nobody remembered to revoke. The Miro admin dashboard shows current team members and board permissions but cannot correlate this data with job functions or flag accounts that have accumulated access beyond their current role. Third-party governance platforms address these gaps by connecting to Miro APIs, identity providers, and HR systems to build comprehensive access maps. Some focus on Miro as one application in a broader SaaS governance strategy while others specialize in deep permission analysis for collaboration tools. This article examines eight platforms for Miro access audits in 2026, covering discovery methods, certification workflows, and remediation capabilities. ## Torii Torii [https://www.toriihq.com] approaches Miro governance as one component of comprehensive SaaS visibility rather than treating it as an isolated collaboration tool problem. The platform discovers Miro users through SSO integrations, direct API connections, and browser extension telemetry that captures access patterns beyond what authentication logs reveal. For organizations running Miro alongside dozens of other enterprise applications, this consolidated approach helps identify users who access boards through multiple paths or retain permissions across systems that should have been revoked together during offboarding. The Torii integration with Miro surfaces employee names, email addresses, job titles, departments, user status, license assignments, license types, and historical usage patterns. This depth enables access reviews that examine whether board permissions align with current job functions and actual usage. When a product manager transitions to a different team, Torii can flag their continued access to strategic planning boards and route the certification decision to the appropriate manager through automated workflows. Access certification campaigns in Torii leverage AI to flag suspicious patterns and route review decisions to stakeholders who understand the business context. The platform supports in-place attestations where managers certify or revoke Miro access without switching contexts, bulk review capabilities for processing multiple users efficiently, and automated remediation that adjusts permissions based on certification outcomes. For compliance teams preparing for SOC 2 or ISO 27001 audits, Torii maintains immutable audit trails with timestamps documenting every access decision. Pros: - Comprehensive discovery across multiple data sources catches shadow Miro access that single-source tools miss - AI-powered anomaly detection surfaces unusual access patterns for priority review during certification campaigns - Combined SaaS management and identity governance eliminates need for separate collaboration tool governance - Strong integration ecosystem with 170+ deep integrations beyond Miro for unified access visibility Cons: - Enterprise pricing may exceed budgets for smaller organizations with minimal SaaS portfolios - Cloud-only platform requires organizations to be comfortable with SaaS delivery model for governance G2 Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars (302 reviews) Capterra Rating: 4.9 out of 5 stars (26 reviews) ## Veza Understanding effective permissions in Miro requires more than listing who belongs to which team or board. Veza [https://veza.com/] addresses this through its authorization graph technology that maps the actual capabilities each user holds across team memberships, board sharing settings, and organization-wide permissions. The platform translates complex Miro permission structures into plain language by expressing access as Create, Read, Update, and Delete operations that reviewers can evaluate without decoding abstract role names. For Miro certification campaigns, Veza provides risk-based sorting that surfaces the highest-risk access first. Accounts with admin privileges, external collaborators with broad board access, and users with permission combinations that create audit concerns receive immediate attention. The platform tracks whether permissions are actively used, enabling reviewers to confidently revoke access knowing that those board permissions have gone untouched for months. The December 2024 ServiceNow acquisition positions Veza for deeper workflow integrations that could benefit Miro governance in the future. The platform supports user-centric reviews covering all of someone's Miro access, resource-centric reviews examining everyone with access to sensitive boards, and on-demand microcertifications triggered by role changes or suspicious activity patterns. Pros: - Authorization graph shows effective Miro permissions translated to understandable operations - Activity tracking reveals whether granted board access is actually being used - Risk-based prioritization focuses reviewer attention on highest-impact access during campaigns Cons: - Enterprise-only pricing with no public pricing information available for evaluation - Limited public reviews compared to more established governance competitors - ServiceNow acquisition creates some uncertainty about future product roadmap direction Gartner Peer Insights: 4.9 out of 5 stars (29 reviews) ## Lumos Certification fatigue kills governance programs when reviewers rubber-stamp hundreds of permissions just to get through their queue. Lumos [https://www.lumos.com/] addresses this with its Albus AI agent that handles routine Miro certification decisions autonomously by analyzing peer group patterns and usage anomalies. Human reviewers focus on exceptions and edge cases while the AI processes obvious approvals and denials based on whether board access aligns with what colleagues in similar roles typically hold. The platform integrates with Slack and Teams to deliver certification workflows where reviewers approve or deny Miro access without leaving their collaboration tools. This approach reduces friction that often delays certification campaigns when reviewers must log into unfamiliar governance dashboards to complete their assigned reviews. Lumos reports completing reviews seven times faster through this combination of AI automation and conversational interfaces. Delta reviews in Lumos focus only on Miro access changes since the last certification cycle, dramatically reducing review fatigue for organizations with large user populations. Rather than re-certifying hundreds of stable board permissions, reviewers examine only new access grants, modified sharing settings, and recently added external collaborators. Pros: - AI agent automates routine certification decisions using peer group analysis and usage patterns - Slack and Teams integration enables approvals without switching to separate governance dashboards - Delta reviews reduce workload by focusing only on Miro access changes since last review Cons: - Learning curve takes longer than initial impressions suggest for complex governance scenarios - No live chat support makes resolving complex implementation issues slower than expected - SaaS focus creates gaps for organizations with significant hybrid on-premise environments G2 Rating: 4.7 out of 5 stars (54 reviews) Gartner Peer Insights: 4.7 out of 5 stars (47 reviews) ## Okta Lifecycle Management The path of least resistance for Miro governance often runs through your existing identity infrastructure. Okta [https://www.okta.com/products/lifecycle-management/] leverages its massive integration library of 7,000+ pre-built connections to provide visibility into Miro access alongside other enterprise applications in a unified platform. For organizations already using Okta for single sign-on, governance features build on existing SSO infrastructure rather than requiring separate identity discovery mechanisms. For Miro certification, Okta offers preconfigured Access Certification Campaigns that accelerate deployment compared to building workflows from scratch. Security Access Reviews introduced in 2025 enable event-triggered reviews when employees change roles or departments rather than waiting for scheduled quarterly campaigns. This reduces the window where inappropriate Miro access persists after organizational changes that affect board permissions. AI-generated access summaries help reviewers quickly understand user access context during investigations. The no-code Workflows feature enables custom automation for Miro governance scenarios without developer involvement. Root Insurance reports saving 100+ hours annually on certification campaigns through automation capabilities that reduce manual review effort. Pros: - Massive integration library connects to virtually any application alongside Miro for unified governance - Preconfigured certification campaigns accelerate deployment compared to custom workflow development - AI-generated access summaries help reviewers understand context during certification decisions Cons: - Group-based provisioning limits granularity for organizations needing fine-grained Miro permission control - Identity Governance requires bundle purchase and is not available as a standalone governance solution - Higher cost at scale compared to some alternatives when governance add-ons are included G2 Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars (1,257 reviews) Capterra Rating: 4.7 out of 5 stars (914 reviews) ## SAP Cloud Identity Access Governance SAP Cloud Identity Access Governance extends enterprise governance controls to cloud applications like Miro through SCIM-based integrations and dashboard-driven administration. SAP IAG [https://www.sap.com/products/financial-management/cloud-iam.html] appeals primarily to organizations with existing SAP investments who want to consolidate governance across their entire application portfolio rather than maintaining separate tools for different application categories. For Miro certification, SAP IAG supports both periodic reviews and event-triggered microcertifications. When employees change roles or departments, the platform can automatically initiate a Miro access review rather than waiting for the next scheduled campaign. This reduces the window where inappropriate board access persists after organizational changes that affect collaboration permissions. The Access Control bridge capability allows organizations to maintain their on-premise SAP GRC investments while extending governance to cloud applications like Miro. This hybrid approach positions SAP IAG for enterprises managing both legacy systems and modern SaaS collaboration tools who prefer a single governance platform rather than multiple point solutions. Pros: - Native integration with SAP ecosystem provides unified governance for organizations standardized on SAP - Event-triggered microcertifications review Miro access immediately after role changes occur - Machine learning role optimization helps reduce over-provisioning across collaboration tools Cons: - Limited workflow customization compared to on-premise SAP Access Control capabilities - Complex platform requires specialized SAP knowledge to configure and optimize effectively - Enterprise pricing creates barriers for organizations outside the existing SAP ecosystem - Public cloud only deployment limits options for organizations with strict data residency requirements Gartner Peer Insights: 4.4 out of 5 stars (114 reviews) ## SailPoint IdentityIQ Large enterprises with complex compliance requirements often need governance depth that lighter tools cannot deliver. SailPoint [https://www.sailpoint.com/products/identity-security-software/identity-iq] serves over 53% of Fortune 500 companies and brings nearly two decades of identity governance experience to Miro access certification. The platform's AI-driven recommendations compare user access against peer groups and flag outliers for priority review, while entitlement modeling goes deeper than role-based approaches to examine specific Miro permissions. For Miro certification campaigns, SailPoint's AI appears as thumbs-up and thumbs-down recommendations during reviews based on whether access patterns align with similar users. The system suggests which permissions to certify or revoke, reducing reviewer fatigue on routine decisions while focusing human attention on genuinely questionable access. Machine learning continuously improves recommendation accuracy based on historical certification decisions. The platform supports up to 500 segregation of duty policies with 50 entitlements each, providing enterprise-grade compliance automation that lighter governance tools cannot match. For organizations with complex compliance requirements around collaboration platform access, this depth enables policy enforcement that simpler tools lack. Pros: - Industry-leading AI recommendations reduce rubber-stamping through peer group analysis - Deepest entitlement modeling enables certification at permission level beyond just application access - Proven enterprise scale with 53% of Fortune 500 validating platform maturity Cons: - Premium enterprise pricing with average annual cost around $240,000 excludes most mid-market organizations - Long implementation cycles of 6-12+ months delay time to value compared to cloud-native alternatives - Steep learning curve requires extensive training before administrators can manage the platform effectively - Configuration complexity requires significant technical resources that many organizations lack G2 Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars (161 reviews) Gartner Peer Insights: 4.8 out of 5 stars (88 reviews) ## MiniOrange Budget-conscious organizations often struggle to justify enterprise IGA pricing for collaboration tool governance. MiniOrange [https://www.miniorange.com/] addresses this gap with IAM and governance capabilities starting at $2-3 per user per month, making access reviews accessible to organizations that cannot afford platforms costing tens or hundreds of thousands annually. The platform serves 25,000+ premium clients globally including Fortune 500 companies. For Miro access reviews, MiniOrange provides SCIM-based provisioning that automates account creation and deletion based on identity lifecycle events. When someone joins or leaves the organization, their Miro access adjusts automatically through HR-driven workflows. The platform supports role-based access control with automated approval routing that ensures Miro permissions align with organizational policies. The Access Governance Automation app for Jira enables workflow-based access requests and certifications through familiar service management interfaces. For organizations already using Jira Service Management, this integration reduces training requirements and adoption friction compared to introducing entirely new governance dashboards for Miro access reviews. Pros: - Affordable pricing at $2-3 per user makes governance accessible to budget-conscious organizations - Rapid deployment in hours rather than months typical of enterprise IGA implementations - 6,000+ pre-built integrations enable comprehensive visibility across collaboration portfolios Cons: - Limited native access certification features compared to dedicated IGA platforms - Support quality varies significantly based on reviewer reports with some experiencing delays - Access governance features require Jira for workflow automation capabilities - Lacks advanced AI-driven risk analytics found in modern governance platforms G2 Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars (264 reviews) Capterra Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars (36 reviews) ## Ping Identity Ping Identity [https://www.pingidentity.com/en.html] brings nine consecutive years of Gartner Magic Quadrant leadership in Access Management to Miro governance through its Autonomous Identity capabilities. The platform evaluates millions of permissions per minute using machine learning to identify access blind spots that traditional review approaches miss. For collaboration tools where permissions accumulate organically, this analytical depth surfaces risks that manual audits would overlook. For Miro certification campaigns, Ping Identity offers AI-assisted decisioning that provides recommendations helping reviewers make informed decisions quickly. Pre-built certification templates, micro-certifications for targeted reviews, and organizational-based certification for B2B partners handling their own user access all support different governance scenarios. The platform reports reducing time spent on access reviews by up to 70% through intelligent automation. The DaVinci orchestration platform provides 6,500+ capabilities across 350+ connectors, enabling complex Miro governance workflows without custom development. Real-time risk predictors analyze bot detection, IP velocity, geolocation anomalies, and user behavior to flag suspicious access patterns during certification cycles. This risk intelligence helps prioritize which Miro permissions require immediate attention. Pros: - AI evaluates millions of permissions per minute to identify Miro access blind spots - Flexible hybrid deployment options including SaaS, private cloud, and on-premises configurations - 6,500+ orchestration capabilities enable sophisticated governance workflows without custom code Cons: - Complex initial setup requires significant IAM expertise to configure governance features properly - Governance features require separate purchase from core identity management capabilities - Higher cost starting at $16,000+ annually creates barriers for smaller organizations - Documentation challenges mean organizations often need implementation partners for complex scenarios G2 Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars (264 reviews) Gartner Peer Insights: 4.4 out of 5 stars (612 reviews) ## How to Choose a Miro Access Audit Platform Selecting the right platform depends on your organization's existing technology investments and compliance requirements. Organizations already standardized on SSO providers like Okta may find platforms with strong IdP integration provide the smoothest path to Miro governance. Enterprises with SAP investments might gravitate toward SAP IAG for unified governance across their application portfolio. For organizations prioritizing unified SaaS governance alongside collaboration platform administration, Torii offers an approach that treats Miro as one component of broader technology portfolio oversight. The platform combines AI-powered discovery with automated anomaly detection to surface access issues that point solutions focused solely on Miro might miss. Companies seeking shadow IT discovery alongside access reviews find this combined approach eliminates blind spots in their governance coverage. Budget considerations matter significantly in this evaluation. Enterprise IGA platforms from vendors like SailPoint and Ping Identity can cost hundreds of thousands annually, while cloud-native alternatives offer more accessible pricing for mid-market organizations. MiniOrange provides entry-level governance at $2-3 per user, though with fewer automation capabilities than premium platforms. Evaluate total cost of ownership including implementation, training, and ongoing administration rather than focusing solely on licensing fees when comparing platforms.