# Article Name 7 OpenAI Identity Governance Tools in 2026 # Article Summary Compare seven identity governance platforms for OpenAI access reviews in 2026. Manage API keys, ChatGPT Enterprise seats, and AI compliance. # Original HTML URL on Toriihq.com https://www.toriihq.com/articles/seven-openai-access-review-vendors # Details OpenAI adoption inside organizations has outpaced traditional software governance by a wide margin in 2026. What started as a few developers experimenting with API calls has expanded into company-wide ChatGPT Enterprise deployments, scattered API keys across dozens of projects, and custom GPTs built by teams who never asked IT for permission. Security leaders now face the same shadow IT problem they thought they solved a decade ago, except this time the ungoverned tools can access, process, and potentially leak sensitive business data. Manual spreadsheets and quarterly access reviews cannot keep pace with the speed of AI tool adoption. Someone creates a new API key for a proof-of-concept project on Monday, and by Friday that key has been copied into three other systems, shared with a contractor, and is generating costs nobody budgeted for. Departed employees leave behind orphaned service accounts still making API calls. Developers hardcode keys into repositories that get pushed to GitHub, where automated scanners find them within minutes and rack up thousands in fraudulent charges. Identity governance platforms address these challenges by connecting to OpenAI's Admin API, Audit Logs, and SCIM integrations to provide continuous visibility into who has access to what. The seven platforms covered here take different approaches to OpenAI access reviews, from comprehensive SaaS management with AI discovery to purpose-built identity security with deep permission analysis. Your choice depends on whether you need OpenAI governance as part of broader IT visibility or as a focused security and compliance initiative. ## Torii Torii approaches OpenAI governance as one component of unified SaaS management and identity administration. The platform connects to OpenAI through direct API integration to discover all organization members, their project assignments, and associated API keys without requiring manual inventory work. For organizations already managing dozens or hundreds of SaaS applications, adding OpenAI to the same governance framework means consistent access review workflows rather than building separate processes for AI tools. The platform tracks the OpenAI fields that matter for access certification, including employee name and email, job title, department, user status, license status, and license types. This data feeds into automated access review campaigns where managers certify whether their team members still need OpenAI access based on their current role. When someone changes departments or leaves the company, Torii [https://www.toriihq.com] triggers offboarding workflows that revoke OpenAI access alongside other application permissions. Where Torii stands out for OpenAI governance is its shadow AI discovery capability. The browser extension and SSO integration detect when employees sign up for OpenAI accounts outside official channels, surfacing the shadow adoption that creates compliance blind spots. Organizations can then decide whether to bring those accounts under management or block unauthorized usage. The platform also provides cost visibility, showing which teams and projects generate OpenAI spending so finance can allocate charges to the right budgets. Pros: Discovers shadow OpenAI accounts through browser extension and SSO monitoring alongside 170+ other SaaS integrations Combines SaaS spend management with identity governance so you can track both OpenAI costs and access permissions in one platform AI-powered access review automation flags unusual permission patterns and routes certifications to correct approvers Workflow automation handles OpenAI provisioning and deprovisioning as part of broader onboarding and offboarding processes Cons: Enterprise pricing may exceed budgets for smaller organizations primarily needing OpenAI governance rather than full SaaS management Cloud-only architecture without on-premise deployment options for organizations with strict data residency requirements G2 Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars (302 reviews) Capterra Rating: 4.9 out of 5 stars (26 reviews) ## Veza Veza takes a permission-centric approach to OpenAI governance through its authorization graph technology. Rather than simply showing who has an OpenAI account, Veza [https://veza.com/] maps the effective permissions each identity holds across your OpenAI organization, projects, and connected systems. The platform translates OpenAI's role hierarchy into plain language operations so reviewers understand exactly what each user can do, whether that's creating new API keys, modifying project settings, or accessing audit logs. The platform handles both human users and the non-human identities that often cause OpenAI security issues. Service accounts, API keys tied to automated systems, and machine identities all appear in the same access graph as employee accounts. This visibility matters because organizations frequently discover that a single API key created months ago has broader access than any individual employee, yet nobody reviews those machine credentials during standard certification campaigns. Veza's access review workflows let you scope campaigns by user, project, or specific OpenAI permissions. Reviewers see whether entitlements are actively used based on API call patterns, making it easier to confidently revoke access that exists on paper but serves no current purpose. The platform prioritizes high-risk items so reviewers focus attention on accounts with admin privileges or unusual permission combinations rather than rubber-stamping low-risk access. Pros: Permission-level visibility shows effective access rights rather than just assigned roles, revealing what users can actually do in OpenAI Strong coverage of non-human identities including service accounts and API keys that traditional access reviews miss Review Intelligence provides AI suggestions based on historical decisions and peer group comparisons Cons: Enterprise pricing without public rates requires sales engagement to evaluate cost fit Fewer pre-built integrations than some competitors may require custom connector work for niche applications ServiceNow acquisition announced in late 2024 introduces some uncertainty about future product direction Gartner Peer Insights: 4.9 out of 5 stars (29 reviews) ## Nudge Security Nudge Security discovers OpenAI usage through a unique email-based approach that finds accounts other tools miss. The platform monitors email confirmations, login notifications, and account creation messages across your Google Workspace or Microsoft 365 environment to build a complete inventory of who signed up for OpenAI services. This method catches the shadow AI adoption happening outside official procurement, including personal accounts employees use for work purposes and API signups that never went through IT approval. The behavioral approach extends to how Nudge Security [https://www.nudgesecurity.com/] handles access reviews. Rather than blocking unauthorized OpenAI usage outright, the platform sends contextual nudges via email or Slack asking employees to confirm whether they still need access and whether their usage complies with company policies. This method achieves an 83% compliance rate compared to 32% for traditional policy enforcement, according to the company's data. The approach works well for organizations that want to govern AI adoption without creating friction that pushes usage further underground. The platform shines at finding the complete scope of OpenAI exposure across your organization. It identifies OAuth grants where OpenAI connects to other business applications, tracks which identity providers authenticate OpenAI access, and surfaces API tokens that may have been created outside official channels. When an OpenAI vendor experiences a security incident, Nudge Security alerts you immediately so you can assess whether your organization's data was affected. Pros: Discovers shadow OpenAI accounts that bypass official procurement through comprehensive email-based monitoring Supply chain breach alerts notify you when OpenAI or connected services experience security incidents Behavioral nudges achieve higher compliance rates than blocking policies while preserving user productivity Cons: Requires Google Workspace or Microsoft 365 for email-based discovery, limiting options for organizations on other platforms Nudge-based compliance relies on user cooperation rather than mandatory enforcement Cannot discover desktop applications or tools that do not generate email confirmations Gartner Peer Insights: 4.7 out of 5 stars (22 reviews) ## Oracle Identity Governance Oracle Identity Governance brings enterprise-grade certification capabilities to OpenAI access management for organizations already invested in the Oracle ecosystem. The platform supports multiple campaign types including user-centric reviews where managers certify their team's OpenAI access, application-centric reviews focused specifically on OpenAI permissions, and event-based micro-certifications triggered when employees change roles or departments. This flexibility lets organizations match their OpenAI governance approach to existing compliance frameworks. The platform's AI and machine learning capabilities help reviewers make informed decisions during OpenAI access certifications. Peer group analysis compares a user's OpenAI permissions against others in similar roles, flagging outliers who have more access than their peers. Prescriptive analytics suggest whether to approve or revoke specific entitlements based on usage patterns and risk scores. These features reduce the rubber-stamping problem where reviewers approve everything without meaningful evaluation. Oracle Identity Governance [https://www.oracle.com/security/identity-management/governance/] offers deep customization for organizations with complex OpenAI deployment patterns. You can create custom connectors for OpenAI's Admin API, define specific certification scopes based on project membership or API key ownership, and build approval workflows with multiple levels of sign-off for high-risk access changes. The trade-off is implementation complexity that typically requires months of configuration work and specialized expertise. Pros: Event-based micro-certifications trigger automatic OpenAI access reviews when job changes occur AI-powered peer group analysis identifies users with anomalous OpenAI permissions compared to similar roles Enterprise scalability handles OpenAI governance alongside thousands of other applications Cons: Complex implementation takes months compared to weeks for cloud-native alternatives Dated user interface creates steep learning curve for reviewers managing OpenAI certifications Premium pricing with processor-based licensing may be prohibitive outside large enterprises Technical support receives mixed reviews for responsiveness and problem resolution G2 Rating: 3.8 out of 5 stars (71 reviews) Gartner Peer Insights: 4.6 out of 5 stars (346 reviews) ## Saviynt Saviynt combines identity governance with privileged access management on a single platform, making it well-suited for organizations where OpenAI API keys require the same security treatment as other privileged credentials. The platform's continuous compliance approach evaluates OpenAI access in real-time rather than waiting for periodic certification campaigns, automatically flagging and optionally suspending access that violates defined policies. This matters for OpenAI governance because API keys can cause significant damage in the time between quarterly reviews. The platform's trust scoring capability reduces certification fatigue by automating decisions for low-risk OpenAI access while surfacing high-risk items for human review. Saviynt [https://saviynt.com/] claims this automation reduces approver workload by up to 75% while increasing revocation rates by 35% because reviewers focus attention on genuinely questionable access rather than rubber-stamping routine permissions. The peer group analysis predicts correct access with up to 94% accuracy, suggesting what OpenAI permissions someone in a given role should have based on their colleagues' patterns. The mobile certification experience lets managers review OpenAI access from anywhere, which proves useful when certification deadlines approach and key approvers are traveling. The interface translates technical OpenAI permissions into business-friendly descriptions so reviewers without deep technical knowledge can still make informed decisions about their team's API access and project memberships. Pros: Unified IGA and PAM on single codebase treats OpenAI API keys with same rigor as other privileged credentials Continuous compliance detects and remediates OpenAI access violations in real-time rather than waiting for periodic reviews Trust scoring automates low-risk decisions so reviewers focus on genuinely questionable OpenAI access Cons: Customer support receives mixed reviews with reports of slow response times and tickets staying open too long Steep learning curve despite user-friendly frontend, with backend complexity requiring specialized expertise Starting price point of $10,000 creates barrier for smaller organizations primarily needing OpenAI governance Gartner Peer Insights: 4.8 out of 5 stars (185 reviews) ## Omada Identity Omada Identity focuses on governance-heavy environments where OpenAI access reviews must satisfy strict regulatory requirements. The platform provides 50 pre-built audit report templates covering ISO 27001, GDPR, SOX, HIPAA, and other frameworks, reducing the manual work needed to document OpenAI access certifications for compliance auditors. The comprehensive audit trail captures every action taken during access reviews, including who made decisions, when, and their documented justifications. The platform's AI assistant Javi enables conversational access governance directly within Microsoft Teams. Entitlement owners can launch OpenAI access reviews, remediate orphaned accounts, and address excessive permissions through natural language commands rather than navigating complex administrative interfaces. This approach fits organizations where the people responsible for OpenAI access decisions are not dedicated identity administrators but business managers who need simple tools. Omada Identity [https://omadaidentity.com/] guarantees implementation in 12 weeks through their Accelerator Package, significantly faster than the 6-12 month timelines typical for enterprise IGA deployments. The platform supports cross-system certification campaigns where OpenAI access reviews happen alongside reviews for connected applications, providing context about how OpenAI permissions relate to broader system access patterns. Pros: Comprehensive compliance coverage with 50 pre-built report templates for major regulatory frameworks AI assistant enables conversational OpenAI access reviews directly within collaboration tools Guaranteed 12-week implementation is significantly faster than typical enterprise IGA timelines Cons: Performance issues reported for large-scale re-certification campaigns with slow processing times Cloud version is significantly more expensive than on-premise deployment Reporting customization is limited despite having many pre-built templates Documentation and training materials need improvement for self-service learning G2 Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars Gartner Peer Insights: 4.6 out of 5 stars (211 reviews) ## MiniOrange MiniOrange offers an affordable entry point for OpenAI access governance at $2-3 per user monthly, making enterprise-grade identity management accessible to organizations that cannot justify the cost of platforms like SailPoint or Saviynt. The platform provides SCIM-based provisioning that automates OpenAI account creation when employees join, updates access as roles change, and revokes permissions immediately when people leave. This automated lifecycle management addresses the orphaned account problem that plagues organizations with manual OpenAI administration. The platform's 6,000 pre-built integrations mean OpenAI access reviews can happen in context with the broader application portfolio. MiniOrange [https://www.miniorange.com/] connects to identity providers like Okta and Microsoft Entra ID, HR systems that drive provisioning decisions, and SIEM platforms that need audit log data. The adaptive risk-based authentication evaluates each OpenAI login attempt based on device, location, and behavioral patterns, triggering step-up authentication for suspicious access without blocking legitimate users. The Access Governance Automation app for Jira enables workflow-driven access requests where employees submit OpenAI access requests through a service portal, approvals route automatically based on predefined rules, and provisioning happens instantly once approvals complete. Every action gets logged for audit purposes. This approach works well for organizations already using Jira Service Management for IT requests. Pros: Affordable $2-3/user monthly pricing makes OpenAI governance accessible to smaller organizations Rapid deployment in hours rather than months typical of legacy IGA platforms SCIM-based automated provisioning handles OpenAI lifecycle management without manual intervention Cons: Limited native access certification features compared to dedicated IGA platforms Access governance automation requires Jira Service Management integration Inconsistent customer support quality with reports ranging from excellent to problematic Lacks advanced AI-driven access analytics found in modern IGA platforms G2 Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars (264 reviews) Capterra Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars (36 reviews) ## How to Choose the Right OpenAI Access Review Platform The right platform depends on your starting point and governance priorities. Organizations already managing diverse SaaS portfolios benefit from platforms like Torii that handle OpenAI as part of unified application governance while also providing cost visibility and shadow AI discovery. If your primary concern is deep permission analysis and security posture rather than SaaS management, Veza's authorization graph approach provides the detailed visibility needed for security-focused access reviews. Budget-constrained organizations should evaluate MiniOrange for basic OpenAI lifecycle management at a fraction of enterprise platform costs. Mid-market companies with strong compliance requirements may find Omada's governance focus and rapid deployment timeline appealing. Large enterprises already invested in Oracle infrastructure will get the deepest integration from Oracle Identity Governance despite its implementation complexity. For organizations prioritizing AI-enabled automation and shadow IT discovery alongside OpenAI governance, Torii offers the combination of SaaS management, identity governance, and cost optimization that addresses both security and financial concerns. The platform's workflow automation handles OpenAI provisioning and deprovisioning as part of broader employee lifecycle management, while shadow AI discovery surfaces unauthorized OpenAI adoption before it becomes a compliance problem.